As ecologists we're used to the messy realities of nature. We think carefully about how to approach a problem, spend inordinate amounts of time researching methods and equipment, and then, when everything breaks, find creative work-arounds to make our experiments work somehow. Yet when it comes to analyzing our messy, complex data we seem to look for the quick way out—canned statistical packages that we don't understand, tortured transformations to shoe-horn our data into a form that we can plug into a statistic we already know, or worst of all, ignoring lots of data because we don't know what to do with it. Well not any more!
We think that as ecologists we should spend as much effort trying to understand our data and answer the questions we first posed as we do collecting the data themselves. We'll need to be creative, we'll need to spend a good deal of mental effort and maybe even some time in the statistical literature to find our way through, but in the end we'll have a much stronger sense of what we found and what we can infer. My goal is not to make you statisticians, but to give you a perspective and some tools that will help you take on your interesting ecological questions. We may not know everything there is to know, but we'll know enough to be dangerous!
Keep in mind:
If you can't write down your problem, you don't understand it
There are almost always other, sometimes more elegant ways to answer a question or get (R) to do something, but who cares about elegance?
Most of what you learn in this class, and your graduate education will take place outside of the class room
Sharing code makes you a good person
Commenting on and improving other people's code makes you an even better person
Our goal is to make you "dangerous," not perfect, so don't worry too much about mistakes (but do fix them!)
The What,Why, and How of the wiki:
We will use this wiki to organize the class (e.g., I'll keep the schedule up-to-date), post labs, and share answers, ideas, and resources.
This is a collaborative site where each of you can add to or edit any page. The more you add, the more useful it can be.
Click on the edit button above on any page to add or edit the contents.
Click on the plus next to "Pages and Files" to add a new page. (Use a descriptive page title and add relevant tags)
If you want to add a file use the "link" or "file" buttons in the editing view
If you totally screw up something, we can always "roll back" to a previous version.
Quantitative Methods and Statistics in Ecology
(formerly know as Tools of the Ecological Detective)
-Learning to be dangerous with statistics!
A bit of philosophy
As ecologists we're used to the messy realities of nature. We think carefully about how to approach a problem, spend inordinate amounts of time researching methods and equipment, and then, when everything breaks, find creative work-arounds to make our experiments work somehow. Yet when it comes to analyzing our messy, complex data we seem to look for the quick way out—canned statistical packages that we don't understand, tortured transformations to shoe-horn our data into a form that we can plug into a statistic we already know, or worst of all, ignoring lots of data because we don't know what to do with it. Well not any more!We think that as ecologists we should spend as much effort trying to understand our data and answer the questions we first posed as we do collecting the data themselves. We'll need to be creative, we'll need to spend a good deal of mental effort and maybe even some time in the statistical literature to find our way through, but in the end we'll have a much stronger sense of what we found and what we can infer. My goal is not to make you statisticians, but to give you a perspective and some tools that will help you take on your interesting ecological questions. We may not know everything there is to know, but we'll know enough to be dangerous!
Keep in mind:
The What, Why, and How of the wiki: